Listening

Why is it so hard to listen?  After nearly thirty years of helping people succeed in various settings, I have come to the conclusion that so many of the challenges we face as leaders center on a failure to listen.  We are capable of hearing without listening, and that, more than anything, keeps organizations locked in cycles of confusion and conflict.  In my thinking, hearing is the physical activity of identifying sounds, but listening is a much more complex and troublesome activity that takes both time and energy.  However I can state emphatically that learning listen by using all your senses will produce a tremendous boost to your leadership ability.  In thinking about how to address this broad subject, it occurred that in the space we have it would be good to address three applications of listening in leadership: listening as the new leader, listening to persuade, and listening by wandering around.

Libby Sartain discusses listening as the new leader, in her book HR From the Heart.  She offers great advice about when to listen.  She recommends that listening is the perfect behavior for a new member of a team, committee, or board.  Even if you’ve studied and worked for years to acquire your new membership, stop, look and listen during your first of many meetings with the group and absorb how the team interacts, what its history is, its culture and values.  Listen, and stop yourself from blurting out all the fabulous input and advice you’ve spent years preparing.  Listening for a long time (longer than you’d really like and are comfortable with) will help prevent you from accidentally touching on a sore subject, or stepping on toes, or any of the other embarrassing, relationship-straining things one can do in an unknown environment.

You may be familiar with the old jokes about Americans speaking English to foreigners in a loud, slow voice, as if the communication barrier was volume, not the inability to understand the language.  I see people repeat that funny situation at the office frequently, except the miscommunication isn’t a language barrier, it’s a values barrier.  To engage in a conversation, you have to be speaking the same language as the other participant, and this doesn’t refer simply to English, Spanish, or even Farsi, but the “language” of values or priorities.

Each time this situation occurs, the speaker turns up the volume insistency of their message, but it’s not their audience that isn’t listening, it’s them.  The leader is not listening to the clues the other person is sending about what influences their decision-making.  Some people don’t decide based on facts alone; the effect of an action on relationships, or a different (more or less optimistic) vision of the future, is their primary decision factor.  If you have tried repeatedly to persuade someone unsuccessfully, you need to listen to where their objections come from and reframe your talking points to address their “hot buttons.”  Listen to their conversation.  Do they discuss current financial reports, or share their vision for the future?  Do they reference individual situations, or do they report on task completion?  Do they use words like, “I think….” Or “I feel…..”?  So much of leadership is persuasion, and to lead effectively you need to be able to use persuasive listening.

Finally, leading by walking around has been a popular concept in leadership circles for many years, but the more important aspect of leading by wandering is to listen during the wandering.  The idea is that a leader should interact regularly with their team members through informal encounters in order to understand what’s really going on.  The spontaneity and “here and now” nature of this allows a manager to get a more accurate understanding for the issues, barriers and real-life operational tactics of his team.

Most leaders will readily agree to the value of this concept, but stall out on its implementation.  “What do I say to them?” they ask.  And anyone who is an experienced practitioner of listening (went to the workshop, got the certificate!) will immediately identify the problem:  Management by walking around doesn’t require ”saying” anything – it demands listening.  The question managers should ask is, “How can I behave to encourage the most frank interaction possible from my team?”  Management by walking around, rather than receiving formal scheduled briefings, is like the difference of listening to a live broadcast compared to a taped program.

The answer to the right question, “How can I behave to encourage the most frank interaction possible from my team?” can be answered this way:  borrow from standard interviewing techniques and prepare a variety of open-ended questions to let the team members know what you’d like to learn about, and then use your best listening techniques to gather information about your employees’ real work.  Resist the urge to offer solutions or resolve problems right away.  Doing that would require you to be talking, and you’re supposed to be listening.  Keep asking follow-up questions, and wait to provide your comments at a later time.

Listening does not come naturally to many leaders, but developing this skill to add to your leadership tool chest will enhance your ability to effectively lead.

 

Share

Character: The Lens of Social Enterprise Authenticity

As enterprises look at social networks for collaboration and mindshare inside the organization, there is a desire to collect and leverage it as a repository for knowledge and experience. Many companies have knowledge experts that have valuable experience and they have new hires ready to participate in the organization’s push into the new millennia.

Internal social networks have been touted as way to engage the company into a conversation that can provide a vehicle for knowledge transfer, idea crowdsourcing and cross functional education and training. And indeed they are. When designed and implemented with upper management support, a well-defined strategy and a commitment to creating a threat free social environment, an internal social network stands to be an amazing asset to the organization.

However, many times organizations overlook the key ingredient to social enterprise success: authentic leadership engagement. Sounds like a big commitment just by the phrase, “authentic leadership engagement.” And it is. In the minds of many leaders internal social networks are there for the workforce. They believe endorsing “the spend” and providing the tools is all that is required of their commitment to the organizational social endeavor. “Go forth and be social!” is the thought. This rarely works.

Leaders today need to engage in the social project regularly and authentically. And they need to do so in a way that guides the conversation to productive insights. No proxy or ghost posters will do. Employees in an organization have amazing “BS detectors” and in the social networking environment they can easily sense when a leader has a proxy. Once detected they can lose all credibility. And let’s be honest, for many organizational leaders social networking is new and intimidating.

 

Much the same as in real life the rules of engagement for authentic leaders in enterprise social networks are a matter of character. My partner Phil Eastman has, as many of you know, written a book entitled, “The Character of Leadership: An Ancient Model for a Quantum Age” that extolls seven elements of character that are required for leaders to effective. They are: Courage, Justice, Temperance, Hope, Wisdom, Love, and Faith. These seven elements are what define your character as a leader in a face to face conversation or relationship. In the social enterprise it is no different. To garner respect and direct the social conversation to authentic levels of interaction leaders must have authentic character.

The Character of Leadership Model is even more important in the modern age of virtual teams and social enterprise. In essence, the Character of Leadership Model is the lens by which employees will view and measure the authenticity of their leaders in the virtual age. And it is only through authentic leadership engagement that a leader’s character will be the guiding force behind a productive social enterprise conversation.

Share

Leadership and Strategy

Every organizational challenge and opportunity is a leadership challenge or opportunity.  Strategic planning is the dynamic and systematic process of meeting challenges and grasping opportunities and so strategic planning is at its base a leadership capability.  I want you to embrace this notion whole-heartedly so that as you engage your organization in strategic planning you will see it as your responsibility to:

  • Provide the organization with a planning framework,
  • Dedicate the time necessary to a robust planning process, and
  • Lead the organization as it implements the strategies.

If your planning process is successful, it will be because you led the process.  If it fails to have the impact on the organization you desire it will be because you did not lead the process.  By leading strategic planning, you will not be involved in every detail or be in every session but you must provide the motivation, perseverance and resources for the process to succeed and for strategy execution to be successful.

 

Share

Mountain Top Wisdom

Below is an article that my friend Sean Rasmussen wrote for our newsletter, The Leadership Advisor.  I know you will enjoy his unique story of about wisdom.

Journalist Norman Cousins once said, “Wisdom is the anticipation of consequences.” There are many great quotations pertaining to wisdom out there, but this is by far my favorite. I guess thinking things through as thoroughly as possible just seems like a simple and palatable way to gain wisdom….”

It’s only September, but it’s cold in the mountains, and my hands and my feet are numb to the wrist and ankle. At some point, the cold overwhelmed the tissue and went to the bones. They’re numb like your lower lip and tongue might get after you’ve been to the dentist. The digits gradually started to feel plump and foreign, like they didn’t belong to me, then they began trying to act on their own whims rather than on my commands, straying from their tasks like so many drunken little sock puppets.

I’m standing on the tips of my frozen toes. I carefully shift my weight from left to right in order to rest my calves, which are burning with a heat of equal intensity to the cold in my feet and hands. They feel like they may give out at any time. Aside from this necessary shifting, I stand as still as possible. The wind is screaming in my ears, but I can still hear my heart pounding in my eardrums as I try to slow my rapid breathing, swallow the acid building in the bottom of my throat, and slowly look down toward Travis, shivering in the wind and snow below.

Travis and I have been climbing together for less than six months. It’s not long in terms of a teammate in the hands of whom you will be placing your life for 1500 feet of climbing, but we have built trust in that time. We climb well together and have been talking a lot about doing something big in the mountains. So with the alpine climbing season waning, we had set out on Friday to climb the famous Elephant’s Perch, slogged gear up to the climber’s camp at Saddleback Lakes under bluebird skies, then watched sullenly as storm clouds crept in from the west and began spitting alternating barrages of snow and rain on our camp dishes. The next morning we awoke to a half inch of snow on the wet ground, and wind pushing storm clouds around everywhere, a deal breaker for sure. Wet icy rock is a recipe for disaster. No one climbs in these conditions. Staring apprehensively upward at our frozen route through the steam of a hot cup of coffee, not really wanting to be the one to call it off, I had asked what I thought was an obviously rhetorical question.

“Well man, what do you think?”

A shaky, “Mmm, yeah, It’ll be ok,” was the reply.

I was sort of dumbfounded. “No way should we get on that route. No way,” I thought. But I hid my shock behind the coffee. I was not going to kill this climb if he wasn’t. We’d just have to go try. “All right… let’s go try,” I said, and so off into the freezing wind we went to do just that.

Now, an hour later, Travis is perched on a very windy ledge about sixty meters off the ground. Between us are fifty more snow-covered meters of the Sawtooth Range’s finest granite rock-climbing, a long, thin, also snow-covered, rope, and the several pieces of climbing protection. The last  items are for arresting a fall should one occur, and I had placed them in various cracks as I ascended. Each piece of protection is built to hold several thousand pounds of force, but they are only as strong as the rock they are placed in. The last of these trinkets is no fewer than forty feet below me, and I doubt I could hang my coat on it, let alone my falling body. It was a frantic placement, jammed quickly behind an inch-thick flake of decomposing rock, with hands trembling under the realization that this was the last protection the mountain would yield for another fifty feet of climbing. I knew it was a dog of a piece when I placed it, and the next good one is twenty feet below it, meaning a fall from here would take me for a 120-foot ride. That’s the sixty feet of granite above my last good protection, and the sixty feet of rope I have out. This is not a proposition which I am relishing very much. Figuring in the elasticity of the climbing rope, I quickly estimate that the fall would put me, oh… roughly right in Travis’ lap, or, more likely, on the ledge next to him. I reach left to a small rock edge, about the width of a pencil, glazed in wet ice. I reach left around a bulge, frantically groping for some weakness which will yield passage to the belay ledge, ten feet above me. No dice. It’s smooth and also covered in ice.

Desperately off-route, terrified, shivering, panicking, almost whimpering, there are a bunch of hard questions rattling around in my head like chunks of gravel: “How long before my calves won’t allow me to stand here any longer?,” “What then?,” “Man, why do I even like climbing? Why do I even do this?,” “What if I die here? What a stupid way to go.” “How did I get here?”

Eventually my shuddering calves drag me back to reality, and the realization that it is time to go. Just as I am about to make a move which I have very little doubt will lead to a fall, an idea occurs to me, and I unclip a piece of metal climbing gear called a nut tool from my harness, and use it to carefully chip the ice off of the edge next to my right hand. It’s terrible, but it will have to do. With a deep breath I force my fingertips against the edge with all my might, step up on a wet knob at knee height, hold my breath, grit my teeth, and pull ever so slowly through until a small bit of snow is at my chin. Blowing the dusting of powder off, to my elation a sharp, in-cut, depression appears in the rock. There is standing water in the bottom of the depression, but, with one last desperate thrust, I am able to use it to pull up and grasp the lip of the belay ledge above me and latch onto the trunk of a small tree there. With all the grace of a beached manatee, I flop into a heap on the two-foot ledge. Safe at last, delivered by a five-dollar nut tool from the single spookiest situation I have ever gotten myself into. I change over the belay and bring Travis up. He arrives on the ledge, shivering uncontrollably after an hour on the belay below.

“Let’s get out of here man! I’m freezing! This is nuts!”

It did not take me long to agree to bail off after climbing only one-quarter of the route. Our day was over.

In rock climbing, you take turns leading. One climber leads, the other follows, then you switch and repeat. When planning a route, both climbers must be comfortable on the terrain they will be responsible for leading, and both must share in the decision-making. Each climber has the right to express ideas, strategies, observations, and misgivings. Each has the right to call the whole thing off if something isn’t right. No questions asked. Both must lead, both must follow. Both must exhibit wisdom.

It’s been four years since that day. I’m sitting here on my front porch on a warm September evening, a beer in my hand, and it’s funny how easy all those questions I was asking myself are to answer. Especially, “How did I get here?”

As with any epic tale, it wasn’t one mistake which got me into the dangerous pickle I was in, but rather, a series of failures in anticipating consequences. Fortunately for those of us who like to do things the hard way, it seems to me that wisdom can be gained in another way. Not just by anticipating consequences, but also, perhaps more painfully, by experiencing them.

Sean Rasmussen works as a commissioning engineer for the energy services company McKinstry Co. He has enjoyed twelve years of working with Treasure Valley building owners, architects, engineers, and contractors to provide functional and efficient buildings to the public and private sector. When not at work, he still enjoys gaining wisdom (usually the hard way) through climbing pursuits, triathlon, and the occasional lesson from his extremely patient wife and children.

 

 

Share

Strategic Planning Essentials

Over the past few weeks I have been deeply involved in strategic planning and as such did this short interview with our local NBC affiliate.  It gives a concise description of the components of strategic planning and what organizational outcomes should be achieved  by a strong planning discipline.  You can watch the short video here.

 

Share

Problem Solving for Leaders

One time while leading an organization, I came home after a long day of challenging situations.  My wife, in the midst of our evening’s conversation, asked me what I did all day.  She knew that I was the person responsible for the organization’s success in the market but did not really know what kept me busy all day.  I had to pause and consider what it was that I really did.  After a few minutes of contemplation, I realized that I did not do anything.  That is not to say that I wasn’t making a contribution to the success of the organization, but my work had become primarily helping the various teams find success.  This meant providing direction, support, troubleshooting, meeting with clients and the like.  What I came to understand after that conversation was that my work was driven by problem-solving and decision-making.

This is true of most leaders.  If we take seriously the work of helping our people succeed, then we naturally ascend to the role of chief problem-solver.  It is not that others in the organization don’t have the ability to solve problems and make decisions; it is that the leader has a full and unique perspective on the organization.  That perspective equips them for easy access to information and an objectivity that many “in the trenches” lose in the course of their productive days.

At this point it will be worthwhile to distinguish between the definitions of decision-making and problem-solving.  Decision-making is the process of choosing between two or more alternatives.  Problem-solving is a larger process that includes decision-making as one of its steps.  Let me illustrate with an example.  About 3:00 every afternoon my blood sugar drops and I feel tired.  That is my problem, and in the process of solving that problem, I may come to realize that I did not eat lunch and as such, need some food, or I may analyze that my problem is caused by a lack of sleep the night before, and thus shut my eyes for a few moments or, more likely, stop by Starbucks for a cappuccino.  How I determine the nature of my problem dictates what decision I will make to solve the problem.  Thus the decision is between food, rest or caffeine while the problem is a lack of energy and ability to focus.

For leaders the difference between the interrelated skills of problem-solving and decision-making is important.  My experience tells me that many leaders are more comfortable with decision-making than problem-solving.  With that in mind, let’s explore a problem-solving process that has been helpful to me and will be to you as well.

The first step (and the most important) is to frame or define the problem.  How a problem is defined will lead directly to the type of alternatives you are willing to consider.  However problem definition is the most often skipped step in problem-solving.  This is true because this initial step takes time and more than a little discipline.

Once the problem is defined, then it is time begin generating the alternatives between which we must choose to solve the problem.  Once all the alternatives for solving the problem have been identified, then it is possible to evaluate the various alternatives and narrow the alternatives to only those that will solve the problem.  Next is selecting the best alternative.  This is the decision-making step.  Once the alternative has been selected, then the required actions must to be taken to implement the decision and the outcomes of the solution tracked and evaluated.

Here is a graphic representation of the problem-solving model.

 

 

 

 

There are two other elements to this process that any leader will find valuable, but they are not really steps in the process itself.   The first is a concept I originally saw in Diane Halpern’s text Thought & Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking (4th Edition) (Erlbaum 2004).  She suggests that problem-solving needs incubation.  This is the idea that a leader should take their attention off the problem at some point in the process to let subconscious mental processes kick in.  She describes incubation as having focused on a problem intensely with little success, only to find a solution pop into your mind while gardening.  My guess is that all of us have had the “aha” moment at some point.

The second element that influences problem-solving is the attitude of the leader.  The demeanor with which you approach the operating and strategic challenges of your organization will have a great bearing on the effectiveness of your solutions.

So, leadership is a role in any organization that is bound, by definition, to face problems.  Having a clear problem-solving model is invaluable.  Remember the key to the process is properly defining the problem and then approaching the process with an open, inquisitive attitude.

Share

Leadership and the Janitor

One of my clients forwarded the following article to me.  I was so touched by the lessons of character and leadership I asked Colonel James Moschgat, USAF (Ret.) if we could put this on our blog.  He consented and so here is his article.

Colonel Moschgat is currently the associate dean of operations at the National Security Space Institute (NSSI) in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Colonel Moschgat can be reached for comment at james.moschgat@afspc.af.mil.

William “Bill” Crawford was an unimpressive figure, one you could easily overlook during a hectic day at the U.S. Air Force Academy. Mr. Crawford, as most of us referred to him back in the late 1970s, was our squadron janitor.Army Master Sergeant William J. Crawford (Ret.), poses for a photo for a Denver Post photographer shortly before a Fourth of July parade in Denver, Colorado. Photo courtesy of Beverly Crawford-Kite.Army Master Sergeant William J. Crawford (Ret.), poses for a photo for a Denver Post photographer shortly before a Fourth of July parade in Denver, Colorado. Photo courtesy of Beverly Crawford-Kite.

While we cadets busied ourselves preparing for academic exams, athletic events, Saturday morning parades, and room inspections — or never — ending leadership classes—Bill quietly moved about the squadron mopping and buffing floors, emptying trash cans, cleaning toilets, or just tidying up the mess 100 college-age kids can leave in a dormitory.

Sadly, and for many years, few of us gave him much notice, rendering little more than a passing nod or throwing a curt, “G’morning!” in his direction as we hurried off to our daily duties. Why? Perhaps it was because of the way he did his job — he always kept the squadron area spotlessly clean, even the toilets and showers gleamed. Frankly, he did his job so well, none of us had to notice or get involved. After all, cleaning toilets was his job, not ours.

Maybe it was his physical appearance that made him disappear into the background. Bill didn’t move very quickly, and in fact, you could say he even shuffled a bit, as if he suffered from some sort of injury. His gray hair and wrinkled face made him appear ancient to a group of young cadets. And his crooked smile, well, it looked a little funny. Face it, Bill was an old man working in a young person’s world. What did he have to offer us on a personal level?

Maybe it was Mr. Crawford’s personality that rendered him almost invisible to the young people around him. Bill was shy, almost painfully so. He seldom spoke to a cadet unless they addressed him first, and that didn’t happen very often. Our janitor always buried himself in his work, moving about with stooped shoulders, a quiet gait, and an averted gaze. If he noticed the hustle and bustle of cadet life around him, it was hard to tell. For whatever reason, Bill blended into the woodwork and became just another fixture around the squadron. The Academy, one of our nation’s premier leadership laboratories, kept us busy from dawn till dusk. And Mr. Crawford… well, he was just a janitor.

That changed one fall Saturday afternoon in 1976. I was reading a book about World War II and the tough Allied ground campaign in Italy, when I stumbled across an incredible story.

On September 13, 1943, a Private William Crawford from Colorado, assigned to the 36th Infantry Division, had been involved in some bloody fighting on Hill 424 near Altavilla, Italy.

William Crawford's Medal of Honor Citation. William Crawford’s Medal of Honor Citation.The words on the page leapt out at me, “in the face of intense and overwhelming hostile fire… with no regard for personal safety… on his own initiative, Private Crawford single-handedly attacked fortified enemy positions.” It continued, “for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at risk of life above and beyond the call of duty, the President of the United States…”

“Holy cow,” I said to my roommate, “you’re not going to believe this, but I think our janitor is a Medal of Honor recipient.” We all knew Mr. Crawford was a World War II Army vet, but that didn’t keep my friend from looking at me as if I was some sort of alien being. Nonetheless, we couldn’t wait to ask Bill about the story.

We met Mr. Crawford bright and early Monday and showed him the page in question from the book, anticipation and doubt on our faces. He stared at it for a few silent moments and then quietly uttered something like, “Yep, that’s me.” Mouths agape, my roommate and I looked at one another, then at the book, and quickly back at our janitor. Almost at once, we both stuttered, “Why didn’t you ever tell us about it?” He slowly replied after some thought, “That was one day in my life and it happened a long time ago.” I guess we were all at a loss for words after that. We had to hurry off to class and Bill, well, he had chores to attend to.

After that brief exchange, things were never again the same around our squadron. Word spread like wildfire among the cadets that we had a hero in our midst — Mr. Crawford, our janitor, had been bestowed The Medal! Cadets who had once passed by Bill with hardly a glance, now greeted him with a smile and a respectful, “Good morning, Mr. Crawford.”

Those who had before left a mess for the “janitor” to clean up, started taking it upon themselves to put things in order. Cadets routinely stopped to talk to Bill throughout the day and we even began inviting him to our formal squadron functions. He’d show up dressed in a conservative dark suit and quietly talk to those who approached him, the only sign of his heroics being a simple blue, star-spangled lapel pin. Almost overnight, Bill went from being a simple fixture in our squadron to one of our teammates.

Mr. Crawford changed too, but you had to look closely to notice the difference. After that fall day in 1976, he seemed to move with more purpose, his shoulders didn’t seem to be as stooped, he met our greetings with a direct gaze and a stronger “good morning” in return, and he flashed his crooked smile more often. The squadron gleamed as always, but everyone now seemed to notice it more. Bill even got to know most of us by our first names, something that didn’t happen often at the Academy. While no one ever formally acknowledged the change, I think we became Bill’s cadets and his squadron.

As often happens in life, events sweep us away from those in our past. The last time I saw Bill was on graduation day in June 1977. As I walked out of the squadron for the last time, he shook my hand and simply said, “Good luck, young man.” With that, I embarked on a career that has been truly lucky and blessed.

Mr. Crawford continued to work at the Academy and eventually retired in his native Colorado, one of four Medal of Honor recipients who lived in the small town of Pueblo.

A wise person once said, “It’s not life that’s important, but those you meet along the way that make the difference.” Bill was one who made a difference for me. Bill Crawford, our janitor, taught me many valuable, unforgettable leadership lessons, and I think of him often.

Here are ten I’d like to share:

1.) Be Cautious of Labels. Labels you place on people may define your relationship to them and bind their potential. Sadly, and for a long time, we labeled Bill as just a janitor, but he was so much more. Therefore, be cautious of a leader who callously says, “Hey, he’s just an Airman.” Likewise, don’t tolerate the O-1, who says, “I can’t do that, I’m just a lieutenant.”

2.) 
Everyone Deserves Respect. Because we hung the “janitor” label on Mr. Crawford, we often wrongly treated him with less respect than others. He deserved much more, and not just because he was received the Medal of Honor. Bill deserved respect because he was a janitor, walked among us, and was a part of our team.

3.) 
Courtesy Makes a Difference. Be courteous to all around you, regardless of rank or position. Military customs, as well as common courtesies, help bond a team. When our daily words to Mr. Crawford turned from perfunctory “hellos” to heartfelt greetings, his demeanor and personality outwardly changed. It made a difference for all of us.

4.) Take Time to Know Your People. Life in the military is hectic, but that’s no excuse for not knowing the people you work for and with. For years a hero walked among us at the Academy and we never knew it. Who are the heroes that walk in your midst?

5.) 
Anyone Can Be a Hero. Mr. Crawford certainly didn’t fit anyone’s standard definition of a hero. Moreover, he was just a private on the day he earned his Medal. Don’t sell your people short, for any one of them may be the hero who rises to the occasion when duty calls. On the other hand, it’s easy to turn to your proven performers when the chips are down, but don’t ignore the rest of the team. Today’s rookie could and should be tomorrow’s superstar.

6.) Leaders Should Be Humble. Most modern day heroes, and some leaders, are anything but humble, especially if you calibrate your “hero meter” on today’s athletic fields. End zone celebrations and self-aggrandizement are what we’ve come to expect from sports greats. Not Mr. Crawford—he was too busy working to celebrate his past heroics. Leaders would be well served to do the same.

7.) 
Life Won’t Always Hand You What You Think You Deserve. We in the military work hard and, dang it, we deserve recognition, right? However, sometimes you just have to persevere, even when accolades don’t come your way. Perhaps you weren’t nominated for junior officer or airman of the quarter as you thought you should — don’t let that stop you. Don’t pursue glory; pursue excellence. Private Bill Crawford didn’t pursue glory — he did his duty and then swept floors for a living.

8.)  No Job is Beneath a Leader. If Bill Crawford, a Medal of Honor recipient, could clean latrines and smile, is there a job beneath your dignity? Think about it.

9.) 
Pursue Excellence. No matter what task life hands you, do it well. Dr. Martin Luther King said, “If life makes you a street sweeper, be the best street sweeper you can be.” Mr. Crawford modeled that philosophy and helped make our dormitory area a home.

10.) Life is a Leadership Laboratory. All too often we look to some school or class to teach us about leadership when, in fact, life is a leadership laboratory. Those you meet everyday will teach you enduring lessons if you just take time to stop, look, and listen. I spent four years at the Air Force Academy, took dozens of classes, read hundreds of books, and met thousands of great people. I gleaned leadership skills from all of them, but one of the people I remember most is Mr. Bill Crawford and the lessons he unknowingly taught. Don’t miss your opportunity to learn.

Bill Crawford was a janitor. However, he was also a teacher, friend, role model, and one great American hero.

Thanks, Mr. Crawford, for some valuable leadership lessons.

 

“Semper Vercundus”

Private William John Crawford was a scout for 3rd Platoon, Company I, 142nd Regiment, 36th Infantry Division, fighting in Italy during World War II on September 13, 1943 — just four days after the invasion of Salerno.

Crawford was a hero, lauded by peers for his actions in combat but was missing in action and presumed dead. Army Major General Terry Allen presented Crawford’s Medal of Honor posthumously to his father, George, on May 11, 1944, at Camp (now Fort) Carson, near Colorado Springs, Colorado.

It was later learned that Crawford was alive and in a POW camp. He returned to the United States after 18 months in captivity.

Crawford retired from the Army after 23 years and went to work as a janitor at the U.S. Air Force Academy so that he could remain close to the military. Master Sergeant William J. Crawford passed away in 2000. He is buried on the grounds of the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado

 

 

Share

The Path to Leadership Authenticity

When I launched The Character of Leadership in September of 2009, I consciously launched it backwards.  Most leadership models are launched after research and a demonstration of the model’s results.  My approach was to offer the model to begin the discussion of character and leadership and inspire leaders and organizations to use the model to make deep and lasting leadership improvements.

The model has achieved some success, but it is clear, as we approach the two-year mark for the model, that I must establish how the character of leadership model connects to organizational outcomes.  To that end, I have been reviewing the scholarly research about leadership authenticity, influence and organizational results. The research confirms what most leaders already know: influence is a leader’s most powerful tool.

Influence is critical in every type of organization in every part of the world.  Yet, it is often overlooked, because organizations are organized in ways that emphasize positional power through organizational charts and decision-making authority through processes.  Although position and process have value, they are an inadequate substitute for what influence can produce.   Influence is under-utilized because it is not as fast to acquire as positional power or process authority.

Influence is earned through leadership authenticity, and authenticity is produced from character.  When people judge the authenticity of leader, they are making judgments about the leader’s character.  They are asking:

  • Can I trust this leader?
  • Is this leader honest?
  • Is this leader fair?
  • Does this leader demonstrate self-control?
  • Is this leader passionate about our work?
  • Does this leader care about me as a person?
  • Does this leader do the right things even when it’s hard?
  • What are the core beliefs this leader espouses?
  • Does this leader demonstrate those core beliefs in our work together?
  • Has this leader shaped a vision of the future that is believable and achievable?

The brutal reality is that influence is not acquired through position, experience or even expertise.  Influence is acquired because people give it to you.  They give you influence over themselves because of your character and the level of authenticity.

I recently watched a leader demonstrate authenticity which cultivated influence with his management team.  This leader is working to move from a command and control philosophy of leadership to one of influence.  At the close of a recent strategic planning session, the leader shared in front of the group that he was nervous, because the new skills he is learning and demonstrating don’t feel natural, and that is scary.  A leader focused on power never admits to fear because, in that person’s mind, stating such a thing appears weak.  For the influential leader, the admission of fear is not a sign of weakness; it is a sign of strength, strength of character.  Based on that admission alone, my client increased his influence with his team and improved the performance of his organization.  He is becoming a leader people want to follow instead of a leader that people have to follow.

You can do the same.  By focusing on your character, you will become an authentic leader with influence.  Always remember that your most powerful leadership tool is influence through authenticity, and the path to authentic leadership winds through your character.

Share

A Strategy for Amy

Tony Greer is the Plant Manager for Bigelow Tea’s Boise facility.  Prior to moving to Boise in 2006, he enjoyed a 15-year stint with Sonoco Products, serving as Plant Manager in three locations before becoming the Regional Manager for 11 plants in the Western US and Canada.   Tony has also co-owned and operated a major construction company, annually framing over 1 million square feet of housing in private and government contracts.   He has expertise in all aspects of Operations Management, with extensive experience in “turnarounds,” Lean manufacturing, change initiatives, and productivity improvement.

Amy stared at the concrete wall.  All jails look the same from the inside, she thought, and this one was no different.  But this time she was different, for Amy had lost hope.  Her past was littered with drug abuse, failed relationships, and a broken family.  She didn’t even know where her three children were.  But she did know that she was facing many years in a cell just like this one.

And then there was a sliver of hope.  While awaiting her court date, Amy’s family scraped together bail money, and somehow Amy ended up at the City Light Home for Women and Children, a ministry of the Boise Rescue Mission.  There, Amy was reunited with her baby, but not her two older children.  She tolerated the recovery program and all of the “house rules,” but somehow felt at home for the first time in a long time.

When the court date arrived, it was quickly apparent that the prosecutor would aggressively pursue a lengthy prison sentence for Amy.  “After all, your honor, this woman has shown no remorse, and I see no reason to believe she will change.”  When it was Amy’s turn to testify, she stood and said, “Your honor, everything they said about me is true.  I’m messed up.  I’ve been in eight or nine recovery programs.  But this time is different.  I don’t know why these people at City Light are doing this for me, but I think they really care.  I’m going to try my best.”

The prosecuting attorney was flabbergasted by the Judge’s decision:  Amy would return to City Light and report back at three-month intervals.  The three-month review was again antagonistic, with the prosecuting attorney nearly demanding jail time.  The judge refused and returned Amy to the program.  After six months, the prosecuting attorney’s posture had changed.  “Your honor,” he said, “the change in this woman is dramatic.  It is easy to see that this program is working.”   He recommended Amy continue with City Light.

A few months later, the director of City Light answered a phone call from Amy’s prosecuting attorney.  The PA said he had been out Christmas shopping and thought of Amy and her baby.  Then he asked, “Could you tell me what they need for Christmas?”   He knew a life was being changed.

Four years later, Amy lives independently with her three children and enjoys a full time position in social work.  If you were to meet her, she would tell you that God changed her life through the people and the ministry of City Light.

This is a true story that could be used to illustrate many principles.  It could speak to the power of faith to heal broken lives, or the value of second chances, or the fulfillment that comes from helping someone in need.  But this is a story about strategy … successful strategy.  For Amy’s recovery, like hundreds of others at City Light and the Boise Rescue Mission, is a result of clear mission and effective strategy.

Stories like Amy’s don’t happen by accident.  Behind the success is a dizzying assortment of strategic initiatives designed to move people like Amy from hopelessness to independence.  There is help for the homeless, food for the hungry, counseling for the hurting, education for the dropout, childcare for the single mom, recovery for the addict, skills training for the veteran, and much more.

These strategies (programs) are not unique, but the results are.  For example, last year, 405 people escaped homelessness with the help of the Boise Rescue Mission.  An amazing 85% continue to live independently one year later.  Amply funded programs across the country only dream of such results.  Given similar circumstances and strategies but fewer resources, the Boise Rescue Mission achieves extraordinary results because of extraordinary leadership.

Reverend Bill Roscoe is the director of the Boise Rescue Mission.  If you’ve spent much time in leadership circles around Boise, Idaho, you’ve heard about Bill.  He is well known for his commitment to the cause of the homeless and helpless.  He is also universally respected as a leader, so it was my pleasure to spend a few hours discussing strategy with him.

I’ve read dozens of books about crafting and implementing strategy.   Bill has read them, too, and he easily discusses standard strategy formulation principles.  We talked about trends, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, objectives, and constraints.   Bill is clearly skilled with the tools of strategy, but more importantly he is a master of the heart of strategy – engaging people in a meaningful pursuit.

This engagement is the lynchpin of successful strategy, and it flows from excellent leadership in three areas:  clear mission, common commitment, and uncommon wisdom.

Clear Mission

“That business mission is so rarely given adequate thought is perhaps the most important single cause of business frustration.”  – Peter Ducker

Asking Bill Roscoe what the Boise Rescue Mission does is like opening a box bulging with passion.  “We serve people in the name of Christ.  We give them hope and an opportunity by meeting their basic needs for food, shelter, health care, and life skills.”    He could spend hours – make that days – talking about the ways this mission is manifested and all of the strategies that have grown out of the commitment.

The importance of a clear mission is nothing new to strategists.  Every organization has one, and almost all of them are well-conceived, well-meaning, and well-written.  But, truthfully, most of them lack passion.  Hearing an enthusiastic explanation of the Boise Rescue Mission’s mission makes you want to join the cause.  That’s clear, compelling mission.

Common Commitment

My conversation with Bill lasted over two hours.  If there were a transcript, I’m certain that a word count would reveal that “we” was used most frequently.  When speaking of his team, there is a terrific sense of pride.  Stories of extraordinary commitment were easy to come by, such as the team leader who takes custody of minor children when mom is in jail, or the person who accepted a dramatic pay cut to join the Rescue Mission team.

What causes such a level of commitment in the team?  Bill says, “They all believe in the mission.”   Some of them are graduates of the programs, thankful evangelists for the cause.  Others simply have a heart that beats in sync with the mission.  At the Boise Rescue Mission, a person’s commitment to the cause is as important as their competence.

Wisdom

“Wisdom is applying my accumulated knowledge and experience effectively to situations.”

Phil Eastman

People follow leaders they believe in.   After a few minutes with Bill Roscoe, you know why the team follows him.  He is a leader of character and especially wisdom.  Bill has been in rescue mission work for over twenty years and has gained vast knowledge and experience in dealing with homelessness, addiction, family dynamics, mental illness, and an incredible array of issues that come with the mission territory.

He has invested the time, energy, and emotion necessary to gain a deep understanding of his field.  But more than just possessing the tools of the trade, he regularly converts his experience into action.  The action may be as simple as meeting with a team member to talk about a recovery program or as complex as starting a new ministry to provide housing and healing to veterans.  Bill knows his business and he takes action, sometimes risky action, on behalf of the cause.  People follow that kind of leadership, and they commit to that kind of cause.

Learning directly from great leaders is inspiring.  Bill Roscoe is a great leader who can teach us much about strategy, mission, commitment, and wisdom.  But for Bill, it’s not about his leadership or even the strategy that he’s crafted, it’s about the hope that it brings to real people … people like Amy.

 


 

Share

Justice Includes Leadership

H. E. Smith considers the knowledge gained while earning an M.S. in Leadership, Disaster Preparedness, and Crisis Management perfectly complements the experience and skills gained from over twenty years in law enforcement.  Now serving as a command-level officer in the Boise Police Department, in Boise, ID, he remains an avid student of organizational leadership and multi-agency emergency responses.

Organizational justice and organizational leadership are interconnected and mutually supportive elements of strong and successful organizations.  Justice, as perceived by those impacted by decisions, creates positive work environments with each member striding towards a common goal.  Based on a clearly defined and developed vision, the common goal supported by actionable objectives becomes attainable for the organization.   Justice and leadership combined provide opportunities for individuals and the organization to reach maximum potential.

Picture this common scenario: vehicles often bunch up traveling the roadway, each of them slightly exceeding the posted speed limit.  Suddenly a police officer appears at the rear of the pack and stops the last car in the group of speeding vehicles.  The drivers of the vehicles not stopped see the officer in their rearview mirrors, and although they continue driving, they do so at a speed closer to the posted limit.  The driver of the stopped vehicle expresses displeasure to the officer, indicating disparate treatment as each vehicle was speeding, but only this vehicle receives a ticket.  While it would be appropriate to ticket each vehicle operator, the officer indicates the ability to only stop and ticket one car at a time.  The driver insists this is not fair, and demands justice.  Perhaps you know this feeling far too well?

Justice indicates fair and ethical treatment for all, but is often difficult to recognize when individuals perceive justice from personal perspectives.  This traffic enforcement scenario might be completely typical, or it might demonstrate an opportunity for individual justice and leadership, if the organization has clearly defined the mission ensuring mutually rewarding expectations for each member.    Justice may be defined as ensuring all individuals or entities are treated equitably, ensuring ethical and moral correctness, while leadership is the ability of one individual to influence a group of individuals to achieve a common goal.  Combining these characteristics provides opportunities for strong organizations to achieve success.

Justice is sought by all, and it is often used in statements of justice was served, or justice was not served, leading to debates about the correctness of a particular decision, and whether an individual or entity was treated fairly based on personal perceptions.  One theory surrounding Plato’s discussion of the charioteer describes injustice as the source of distrust, causing the horses to pull in different directions, rendering the chariot inoperable.  Correlations indicate the chariot could be in perfect condition with the finest steeds attached, but if there is no charioteer, there is no directed movement.  Conversely, if there is a driver, but the horses do not work together, there will still be limited productive movement.  Justice determines the need for all the parts to receive equitable treatment, allowing and encouraging each part to perform their assigned task.  When this occurs, the charioteer is able to operate the chariot, and suddenly it becomes a machine capable of moving a specified direction at a specified speed, completing the charioteer’s goals.

Organizations require justice and leadership, as each member of a just organization works together under equitable treatment. However, leadership provides direction and mission, just as the charioteer directs the horses in a just and orderly fashion.  The charioteer understands the vision and knows what to do with the chariot because of clearly established directions and expected outcomes identified by the leader.  Leadership and justice work best when they co-exist in an organization, and all members of the organization from highest to lowest understand their personal task and the ultimate objectives of the entire organization.

The ticketed driver demonstrates the difficulty of ensuring the service of justice.   In the driver’s mind, service of justice begins with equal treatment of all parties, meaning each driver in the group should get a ticket, or none of them, including this driver, should get a ticket.  The officer writing the ticket demonstrates leadership by looking at the over- arching goal of the organization of traffic safety for all, which includes writing tickets as needed, while seeking traffic law compliance by all.  Depending upon the individual’s position, justice and leadership were on display, or an injustice requiring correction occurred.  Much like the chariot, all parts must understand and accept their role to achieve ultimate success.

Leadership becomes a key element in ensuring justice not only occurs, but all involved and uninvolved parties understand how justice is applied.  Strong leadership recognizes the need for a clearly delineated vision and understands the requirement for following actionable objectives to attain the vision.  Organizations striving to attain their vision will ensure justice occurs not only internally, but with every external employee interaction through a mutual reward system.  Justice no longer becomes an organizational objective, but instead becomes a core value of the organization exhibited daily as all members work to achieve common goals by pulling in the same direction.  The driver of the vehicle stopped for speeding still receives a ticket, but the officer involved explains fully how this single traffic stop relates to the complete highway safety vision of the organization.  Although not all vehicles were stopped, those drivers who do not slow down and obey the traffic laws will eventually receive tickets elsewhere.   All the parts are working towards the same goal, much as the charioteer prepares for and completes the race.

Justice indicates fair, equitable, ethical, and moral treatment for all.  The term justice is used regularly and often in the form of justice was served or justice was not served; however, beyond mere words, most individuals demand and expect fair treatment.   Fair treatment is hard to quantify, as it normally comes from a personal perspective rather than a high, arching overview.  Leadership, which is the motivational ability to encourage others to accomplish common goals, provides the overview by indentifying organizational opportunities for implementing justice.  Organizations that completely immerse justice into their leadership vision create opportunities for individuals to not only feel justice from the organization, but also demonstrate justice to others.  Leadership and justice go together, and strong organizations with committed leaders recognize the positive and successful outcome paralleling just individuals seeking common goals.

Share





Join the Conversation

Phil Eastman IIThe challenges we face today are not economic, environmental, social, or legal; they are challenges of character and leadership."